Abstract
The Fitness and Probity (F&P) regime of the Central Bank of Ireland (CBI) is a cornerstone for ensuring governance and accountability in financial institutions. With a view to further strengthen the F&P regime, Andrea Enria (former Chair of the Supervisory Board of ECB) was entrusted to conduct an independent review evaluates the regime’s alignment with international standards, identifying strengths and areas for improvement. This article evaluates the findings and recommendations of the Enria report while placing the Irish framework within a global context, with an emphasis on the Middle East and North Africa (MENA) region. According to the author of the blog, fit and proper assessment is a tool to prevent conduct risks from deterioration of tone at the top. Thus, the reports suggestion to devote resources at prevention rather than cure is praiseworthy from a supervisory perspective.
Introduction
The Enria report, commissioned by the Central Bank of Ireland (CBI), and prepared by Andrea Enria (former Chair of the Supervisory Board of ECB), provides an independent review of its Fitness and Probity (F&P) framework. This framework, established under the Central Bank Reform Act 2010, aims to ensure individuals occupying senior roles in financial firms meet high standards of competence, integrity, and ethical behavior. Enria’s review was initiated in response to stakeholder concerns about fairness, transparency, and efficiency, as well as a decision by the Irish Financial Services Appeals Tribunal (IFSAT) that highlighted deficiencies in the existing framework.
The report evaluates whether the F&P framework aligns with international practices, identifies areas of improvement, and proposes reforms to enhance its clarity, internal governance, and transparency. The review is set against a backdrop of evolving global regulatory trends in fitness and propriety requirements, emphasizing accountability in financial systems.
To provide context, a comparison of global regulatory practices reveals trends and best practices:
- European Union (EU):
The European Banking Authority (EBA) and European Central Bank (ECB) have established detailed guidelines emphasizing proportionality, conflicts of interest, and collective suitability for board roles.
Footnote 1: European Banking Authority, Guidelines on the Assessment of the Suitability of Members of the Management Body and Key Function Holders, 2021. - United Kingdom (UK):
The Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) and Prudential Regulation Authority (PRA) operate under the Senior Managers and Certification Regime (SMCR), which combines fitness and propriety checks with accountability measures.
Footnote 2: FCA and PRA, Senior Managers and Certification Regime Handbook, 2019. - United States (US):
US financial regulators prioritize a principles-based approach, assessing senior management through supervisory reviews focusing on competence and ethical conduct.
Footnote 3: Federal Reserve System, Guide to Supervisory Standards for Financial Institutions, 2020. - Australia:
The Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) emphasizes institutional accountability under its “Prudential Standards CPS 520 Fit and Proper.”
Footnote 4: Australian Prudential Regulation Authority, Prudential Standards CPS 520 Fit and Proper, 2021. - Asia:
Regulators in Singapore and Hong Kong adopt global standards while tailoring fitness and propriety assessments to regional risks.
F&P in GCC
The GCC region has developed robust fitness and propriety frameworks:
Central Bank of Bahrain (CBB): The CBB requires rigorous vetting for board and senior management roles, annual compliance attestations, and ongoing training.
GCC-Wide Initiatives: Regulators in Saudi Arabia, the UAE, and Qatar are harmonizing fitness and propriety standards, emphasizing governance, AML/CTF compliance, and alignment with international norms.
Key Trends in Global Regulation
- Proportionality: Regulators are tailoring assessments based on the complexity and systemic importance of financial institutions.
- Ongoing Assessments: Many frameworks now require continuous monitoring of fitness and propriety, not just one-time approvals.
- Enhanced Transparency: Regulatory expectations are increasingly codified to ensure fairness and clarity.
- Focus on Governance: Fitness and propriety are being integrated into broader corporate governance initiatives.
Implications for Ireland
The global comparison highlights areas where Ireland could align more closely with international best practices, such as: enhanced clarity and accessibility of F&P standards, proportional calibration of assessments based on institution size and complexity and strengthened links between F&P assessments and broader corporate governance requirements.
Enria Report : An Evaluation
The Enria report provides a balanced perspective on CBI’s F&P framework. The Strengths mentioned included – a)the framework aligns broadly with international best practices, b) Stakeholders recognize its role in promoting governance and integrity and c) It has successfully raised the bar for leadership roles in the financial sector.The Weaknesses on the other hand were a) Lack of consolidated, user-friendly guidance for stakeholders, b) perceived inconsistencies in how the framework is applied across firms and sectors, c) Overlap between F&P and enforcement functions creates confusion and d) Concerns about fairness and transparency in decision-making processes.
Based on a detailed assessment of the existing F&P regime, the report outlines reforms in three key areas:
- Clarity of Supervisory Expectations:
- Consolidate fragmented guidance into a single, accessible document.
- Enhance communication through Q&A sessions and workshops.
- Internal Governance Enhancements:
- Establish a centralized unit dedicated to F&P assessments, separate from enforcement functions.
- Introduce a senior panel to handle complex cases.
- Fairness, Efficiency, and Transparency:
- Provide candidates with timely feedback and opportunities to challenge assessments.
- Commit to clear timelines and publish granular data on outcomes.
The Report mentions some core issues ( some quotes from the Report)
The Enria Report:
- On the Role of the F&P Framework:
“The Fitness and Probity framework is a cornerstone of the regulatory reforms introduced after the extensive damage generated in Ireland by the Great Financial Crisis.” - On Gatekeeping Standards:
“An effective gatekeeping function requires three ingredients: a clear framework, rigorous vetting by financial firms, and strict adherence to fair procedures throughout the process.” - On Supervisory Judgement:
“Supervisory judgement is indispensable for assessing the fitness and probity of individuals, allowing a nuanced evaluation of their qualifications and ethical standing against the business model and risk profile of their firm.” - On Procedural Fairness:
“Fairness and transparency are essential ingredients of a well-functioning Fitness and Probity process, given the impact of decisions on both individuals and firms.” - On Internal Governance Enhancements:
“The F&P process at the Central Bank is fragmented across different units. Establishing a single, centralized unit for gatekeeping would improve consistency, efficiency, and clarity.” - On Stakeholder Engagement:
“During the review, extensive consultations were conducted with stakeholders, including regulated entities, policymakers, and Central Bank staff, to capture diverse perspectives and identify key areas for improvement.” - On Clarity of Standards:
“Consolidating fragmented standards into a single document and complementing them with workshops and Q&A sessions would help firms and candidates better understand and navigate the F&P process.” - On Transparency in Decision-Making:
“Candidates who are not successful should receive clear feedback, indicating steps required to address gaps and achieve success in future applications.”
Can the Report Benefit the Irish Financial Sector?
In my assessment, it certainly can. The Enria report presents a roadmap for enhancing Ireland’s F&P framework by addressing identified weaknesses and learning from global and regional best practices. Implementing these reforms will align the framework with evolving international standards, strengthen public trust, and solidify Ireland’s reputation as a leader in financial regulation. More importantly, it will prioritize prevention ahead of cure when it comes to conduct risk, especially, the tone at the top issues that so frequently are at the heart of bank failures.
References
- Central Bank of Ireland. Fitness and Probity Standards. Dublin: Central Bank of Ireland, 2017. Available at: https://www.centralbank.ie/docs/default-source/regulation/how-we-regulate/fitness-probity/regulated-financial-service-providers/fitness-and-probity-standards.pdf.
- European Banking Authority. Guidelines on the Assessment of the Suitability of Members of the Management Body and Key Function Holders. Paris: EBA, 2021. Available at: https://www.eba.europa.eu/regulation-and-policy/internal-governance/guidelines-on-suitability-of-management-body.
- FCA and PRA. Senior Managers and Certification Regime Handbook. London: FCA, 2019. Available at: https://www.handbook.fca.org.uk/.
- Federal Reserve System. Guide to Supervisory Standards for Financial Institutions. Washington, DC: Federal Reserve, 2020. Available at: https://www.federalreserve.gov/.
- Australian Prudential Regulation Authority. Prudential Standards CPS 520 Fit and Proper. Sydney: APRA, 2021. Available at: https://www.apra.gov.au/sites/default/files/2021-04/CPS%20520%20-%20April%202021.pdf.
- Central Bank of Bahrain. Rulebook Volume 1: High-Level Controls and Corporate Governance Standards. Manama: Central Bank of Bahrain, 2020. Available at: http://www.cbb.gov.bh/.
- Gulf Cooperation Council. Charter for Financial Sector Governance. Riyadh: GCC Secretariat General, 2019. Available at: https://www.gcc-sg.org/.
- Basel Committee on Banking Supervision. Corporate Governance Principles for Banks. Basel: Bank for International Settlements, 2015. Available at: https://www.bis.org/bcbs/publ/d328.pdf.
- Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). G20/OECD Principles of Corporate Governance. Paris: OECD Publishing, 2015. Available at: https://www.oecd.org/daf/ca/Corporate-Governance-Principles-ENG.pdf.
- European Central Bank. Guide to Fit and Proper Assessments. Frankfurt: ECB, 2021. Available at: https://www.bankingsupervision.europa.eu/ecb/pub/pdf/ssm.fap_guide202107.en.pdf.
- Financial Stability Board. Strengthening Governance Frameworks to Mitigate Misconduct Risk: A Toolkit for Firms and Supervisors. Basel: Financial Stability Board, 2018. Available at: https://www.fsb.org/wp-content/uploads/P200418.pdf.
- Hong Kong Monetary Authority. Guideline on Fit and Proper Criteria. Hong Kong: HKMA, 2020. Available at: https://www.hkma.gov.hk/media/eng/doc/key-information/guidelines-and-circular/guideline_no._3.3.1.pdf.
- Monetary Authority of Singapore. Guidelines on Fit and Proper Criteria. Singapore: MAS, 2021. Available at: https://www.mas.gov.sg/-/media/MAS/Regulations-and-Financial-Stability/Regulations-Guidance-and-Licensing/Financial-Institutions/Guidelines-on-Fit-and-Proper-Criteria.pdf.
- International Monetary Fund. Ireland: Financial Sector Assessment Program—Technical Note on Financial Safety Nets and Crisis Management Frameworks. Washington, DC: IMF, 2021. Available at: https://www.imf.org/en/Publications/CR/Issues/2021/09/15/Ireland-Financial-Sector-Assessment-Program-Technical-Note-on-Financial-Safety-Nets-and-465576.
- Saudi Arabian Monetary Authority (now Saudi Central Bank). Corporate Governance Regulations for Financial Institutions. Riyadh: SAMA, 2021. Available at: https://www.sama.gov.sa/.
- Qatar Central Bank. Fit and Proper Guidelines for Board and Senior Executives. Doha: QCB, 2022. Available at: https://www.qcb.gov.qa/.
- World Bank Group. Strengthening Governance and Accountability in the Financial Sector. Washington, DC: World Bank, 2020. Available at: https://documents.worldbank.org/.
- International Finance Corporation. Corporate Governance in Financial Institutions: Best Practices and Lessons Learned. Washington, DC: IFC, 2021. Available at: https://www.ifc.org/.



Leave a Reply